Other than his idea of Radical Democracy and how everyone should
be represented equally and have the same amount of rights, I didn't understand
much of what Freire was saying. So luckily what I did understand, the Radical
Democracy, ties into what Gatto said. He many times pointed out how the K-12
education system made the students conform to one idea of what the students
should be like. He also talked about a "selecetive function"
that the education system also brought upon students that didn't give students
the same amount of equality because it discriminate against the students that
weren't in the higher, Advanced Placement classes. They also both
assume that the student knows nothing. In Freire’s “The Banking Concept of
Education” he plainly points out that he doesn’t think that the students know
anything. He says, “the teacher knows everything and the student knows nothing;”
demeaning students in the same fashion Gatto does. Other than wanting equality
in the education system and thinking that students didn’t know anything while
teachers knew everything, I don’t see any other similarities because I didn’t understand
Freire’s essay very much. I couldn’t contrast them either because I didn’t know
what he was talking about most of the time.
No comments:
Post a Comment